- From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:54:03 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2011-06-18 15:09, Adam Barth wrote: >> >> How does your implementation compare to existing browsers on this test >> suite: >> >> http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/fast/url/ >> >> In particular, it would be helpful to add entries for your >> implementation to the following table so that we can see whether it >> makes desirable trade-offs in situations where browsers differ in >> behavior: >> >> https://raw.github.com/abarth/url-spec/master/tests/gurl-results/by-browser.txt > > Get me an easily parseable file (*) with test cases, and I can produce the > results. The test suite above should be easy to parse and deal with. By the way, how does your proposal deal with the fact that different schemes are parsed different? Adam
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 04:55:02 UTC