- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:45:40 +0200
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
On 2011-06-19 06:54, Adam Barth wrote: > ... > The test suite above should be easy to parse and deal with. > ... Well, last time I checked it wasn't easy to me. > By the way, how does your proposal deal with the fact that different > schemes are parsed different? The proposal to use RFC 3986? Schemes are not supposed to parse differently. When it happens, it's a *bug*. That being said, to handle a specific scheme differently requires extracting the scheme component first, right? Once you have done this, you can apply any kind of post-processing to the individual components to get the scheme specific handling you want. I *did* mention this in my mail: > - optional postprocessing (fix non-ASCII characters in query parameter when not originating from UTF-8 encoded document; maybe scheme-specific cleanup). Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 07:46:18 UTC