- From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:51:25 -0700
- To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net> wrote: > On 6/18/2011 7:16 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> On 2011-06-18 15:09, Adam Barth wrote: >>> >>> How does your implementation compare to existing browsers on this test >>> suite: >>> >>> http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/fast/url/ >>> >>> In particular, it would be helpful to add entries for your >>> implementation to the following table so that we can see whether it >>> makes desirable trade-offs in situations where browsers differ in >>> behavior: >>> >>> >>> https://raw.github.com/abarth/url-spec/master/tests/gurl-results/by-browser.txt >>> >> >> Get me an easily parseable file (*) with test cases, and I can produce >> the results. >> >> Best regards, Julian >> >> (*) That's something other than Javascript source code. >> > > Could the implementers on this list respond with a format for storing test > cases that they would prefer to use? Speaking for myself, I prefer a format that can be used to automatically test web browsers in a black-box fashion. It's fine if that's some JSON file that an HTML driver reads and tests. The test suite I linked to before is a good example of an automated test suite that can be run directly in browsers. Adam
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 04:52:26 UTC