W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-iri@w3.org
public-iri@w3.org from February 2011
by thread
22 messages
:
Starting
Wednesday, 9 February 2011 03:33:43 UTC,
Ending
Friday, 25 February 2011 00:47:41 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
Fwd: IRI - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 80
Marc Blanchet
(Friday, 25 February)
[iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4
iri issue tracker
(Friday, 11 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4
iri issue tracker
(Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4
Peter Saint-Andre
(Friday, 18 February)
[iri] 4395bis #56 (new): References in 4395bis
iri issue tracker
(Wednesday, 9 February)
[iri] 4395bis #55 (new): Decide on the status of 'afs' URI scheme
iri issue tracker
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means
Tony Hansen
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means
Martin J. Dürst
(Thursday, 10 February)
Re: [iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Thursday, 10 February)
FWD: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: FWD: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
Julian Reschke
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: FWD: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Wednesday, 9 February)
[iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means
iri issue tracker
(Wednesday, 9 February)
URI registrywas: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
Martin J. Dürst
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: URI registrywas: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
t.petch
(Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: URI registry (was: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme)
Martin J. Dürst
(Thursday, 10 February)
Re: [apps-discuss] URI registry
Alexey Melnikov
(Thursday, 10 February)
Re: [apps-discuss] URI registry
Graham Klyne
(Thursday, 10 February)
Re: [apps-discuss] URI registry
Tony Hansen
(Thursday, 10 February)
Re: URI registrywas: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
(Thursday, 10 February)
Last message date
: Friday, 25 February 2011 00:47:41 UTC