- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:52:49 -0600
- To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- CC: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
<hat type='individual'/> On 8/22/11 5:34 PM, Chris Weber wrote: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/81> > > I think this ticket is ready to be closed. It sounds like the > suggestion here was to have terminology defined for the term 'scheme'. I > can sort of see the point if there was no explicit terminology > definition for 'scheme', but Section 1 Introduction seems to describe it > suitably as: > > "Each URI begins with a scheme name, > as defined by Section 3.1 of RFC 3986, that refers to a specification > for identifiers within that scheme. " > > Also Section 6.4. URI/IRI Scheme Registration Template seems to relate a > "scheme" to its name and 'model' with more detail. I don't see the confusion and I think this issue can be closed. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:53:18 UTC