- From: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:34:31 -0700
- To: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/81> I think this ticket is ready to be closed. It sounds like the suggestion here was to have terminology defined for the term 'scheme'. I can sort of see the point if there was no explicit terminology definition for 'scheme', but Section 1 Introduction seems to describe it suitably as: "Each URI begins with a scheme name, as defined by Section 3.1 of RFC 3986, that refers to a specification for identifiers within that scheme. " Also Section 6.4. URI/IRI Scheme Registration Template seems to relate a "scheme" to its name and 'model' with more detail. --- Chris Weber IRI WG co-chair
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 23:34:15 UTC