- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:51:26 -0600
- To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- CC: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
<hat type='individual'/> On 8/22/11 5:00 PM, Chris Weber wrote: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/70> > > Does this working group and the document editors agree that a "SHOULD" > is the most appropriate here? If so this issue can be closed. The current text is: New URI/IRI schemes SHOULD have clear utility to the broad Internet community, beyond that available with already registered URI/IRI schemes. I think "SHOULD" is fine. I think "MUST" would be problematic because it would lead to fruitless arguments about whether the utility of the scheme is truly clear and whether the community that would benefit from registration of the scheme is truly broad. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:51:56 UTC