Re: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] editorial

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:52:46 +0200, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:18 +0200, Martin J. Dürst 
>>> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>>>> Any better idea for a name? I find "needs to be used" a bit too 
>>>> strong, but I guess it's the users' choice, not ours.
>>>  HTML5 re-used the term URL. That worked for me. I'm not sure why 
>>> "needs to be used" is a bit too strong. Browsers handle URLs the same 
>>> everywhere. (Admittedly outside HTML context the encoding is often 
>>> just set to UTF-8 by default, but that is not the only part of the 
>>> algorithm that matters.)
>>
>> ...but that's the main difference to LEIRIs, as specified, right?
>>
>> Julian (still hoping that we're not going to define *two* supersets of 
>> IRIs)
> 
> I don't know the details of LEIRIs. I thought it did not allow all 
> characters, but maybe it does.

<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-7.1>.

BR, Julian

Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 09:05:56 UTC