- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:05:04 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, public-iri@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:52:46 +0200, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:18 +0200, Martin J. Dürst >>> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >>>> Any better idea for a name? I find "needs to be used" a bit too >>>> strong, but I guess it's the users' choice, not ours. >>> HTML5 re-used the term URL. That worked for me. I'm not sure why >>> "needs to be used" is a bit too strong. Browsers handle URLs the same >>> everywhere. (Admittedly outside HTML context the encoding is often >>> just set to UTF-8 by default, but that is not the only part of the >>> algorithm that matters.) >> >> ...but that's the main difference to LEIRIs, as specified, right? >> >> Julian (still hoping that we're not going to define *two* supersets of >> IRIs) > > I don't know the details of LEIRIs. I thought it did not allow all > characters, but maybe it does. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-7.1>. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 09:05:56 UTC