- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:58:41 +0200
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, public-iri@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:52:46 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:18 +0200, Martin J. Dürst >> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >>> Any better idea for a name? I find "needs to be used" a bit too >>> strong, but I guess it's the users' choice, not ours. >> HTML5 re-used the term URL. That worked for me. I'm not sure why >> "needs to be used" is a bit too strong. Browsers handle URLs the same >> everywhere. (Admittedly outside HTML context the encoding is often just >> set to UTF-8 by default, but that is not the only part of the algorithm >> that matters.) > > ...but that's the main difference to LEIRIs, as specified, right? > > Julian (still hoping that we're not going to define *two* supersets of > IRIs) I don't know the details of LEIRIs. I thought it did not allow all characters, but maybe it does. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 08:59:40 UTC