- From: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:42:45 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org>, uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > websock seems like a good balance... Apologies for the cross-list posting. I have to vote with Chris on this. 'ws' is confusing to many and cryptic to the rest. 'websock' has the advantage of immediate clarity to all. The 5-characters difference is not worth the cost of defining a new abbreviation that adds no value. Think of this as an opportunity for marketing. "websock" reinforces the brand, while "ws" weakens it. -Pieter Hintjens
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 13:43:07 UTC