Re: Soft Launch of a W3C Invited Expert identity program

Hi Coralie!

In general, I am supportive of this effort. However wrt ...

> 2) A public mailing list so you can interact among yourselves.
> cf. <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-invited-experts/>

I think a Member-only list instead or in addition would maybe be more
useful here. Technical discussions belong in the public technical fora,
but if we are coordinating personal logistics--which I imagine to be
the main benefit of such a list--it's helpful if that discussion doesn't
have to be public?

E.g. the CSSWG often uses the internal list to coordinate housing, dinner,
cell phone number swaps, etc... not really info that should be public.
(The rest of the list scope is general administrivia, to keep it off of
the public list. That could be public but isn't particularly interesting
to the public so didn't deserve its own public ML.)

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 14:48:10 UTC