- From: Konstantinos Komaitis <konstantinos@komaitis.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:47:49 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Sebastian Lasse <mail@sebastianlasse.de>, "Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)" <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, Nick Doty <ndoty@cdt.org>, public-interop-remedies@w3.org
> >> On 10 Jan 2022, at 2:49 pm, Sebastian Lasse <mail@sebastianlasse.de> wrote: >> >> I don't understand. >> EU has now multiple times asked for technical input. >> They need it BEFORE decisions. >> >> The only time I have ever seen W3C in the discussion was here >> https://openforumeurope.org/event/ofe-lounge-series-standardisation-and-open-source/ >> This is now the final stage! > > My understanding is that the DMA (much like the ACCESS Act in the US) defines the legal landscape for requiring interoperability (among many other things) from 'big tech'. It does not, however, specify the technical means of doing so -- instead, it creates the institutions and processes for finding and imposing them. > > As such, the important part of the DMA to focus on now is that those details are correct. > > That’s correct - currently the EU is fleshing out the framework and then they will move into implementation, which is were the meat really is and where — historically — Europe has done a_very_poor job. (Look no further than the GDPR). Konstantinos
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 13:49:43 UTC