Re: DMA amendments

pt., 7 sty 2022 o 17:19 Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
napisaƂ(a):

>
> Il 07/01/2022 16:48 Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>
> I don't want to be a party breaker here or anything like that... But to be
> honest, until there's a final text, we should remain cautious about any
> definitions/etc. Especially 'amendments'. Just saying: let's be. careful
> here.
>
> These are not amendments any more, this is the final-for-now text as
> approved by the Parliament on Dec 15, which was on this list already on Dec
> 6, since in the end the Parliament only made relatively minor changes to
> the commission's compromise text. But it's true that next week the
> trialogues will start, then there will be a final vote by the Parliament
> and the final-forever text could be different, so at this point in time
> indeed we can just have preliminary discussions on how things could
> possibly look.
>

My point was indeed that the amendments/etc mean it's still not final. Now
the EU Council will finalize theirs, and then the final thing is going to
be negotiated.



>
> --
>
> Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
> vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
> Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
>
>

Received on Friday, 7 January 2022 17:21:38 UTC