Obviously your knowledge of Lightning is limited, since your definition of "network money" describes it perfectly. Can you please explain what the difference is?
Sent from BlueMail
On Nov 15, 2018, 3:41 AM, at 3:41 AM, Giovanni P <fiatjaf@alhur.es> wrote:
>It shouldn't, as it isn't "network money", but rather a
>blockchain-enforced banking system.
>
>On 11/15/18, Marc Wood <marcdw87@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Will there be discussion of BTC Lightning Network allowed on this
>list?
>>
>> Sent from BlueMail
>>
>> On Nov 15, 2018, 3:02 AM, at 3:02 AM, Michiel de Jong
><michiel@unhosted.org>
>> wrote:
>>>Hi guys,
>>>
>>>I created a new mailing list to discuss topics in the research field
>in
>>>which Interledger plays a major role. We could call it "Network
>Ledger
>>>Technology": the idea that money can be transfered across a network
>of
>>>ledgers, by coordinating multiple smaller transactions (hops),
>instead
>>>of
>>>actually moving any money.
>>>
>>>I wrote a blogpost (some of you already proofread it!) titled
>"Network
>>>Ledger Technology: The First 15 Years", in which Interledger is also
>>>mentioned. See my post on the Network Money mailing list for the
>link!
>>>:)
>>>
>>>Subscribe here:
>>>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/network-money
>>>
>>>If you're also interested in these topics, then please subscribe, and
>>>if
>>>you feel like it, write an introductory post to say hi and mention
>your
>>>interests there! :)
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Michiel
>>