- From: Ahmed Khaleel <akhaleel@pixelalpha.io>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:35:34 -0600
- To: Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com>
- Cc: ledger@ietf.org, public-interledger@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 04:39:48 UTC
Theoretically it’s sound but the market liquidity isn’t there yet. I’m finishing up an ilp exchanger and working on an exchange next. I did alot of experimenting and one solution seems to be the best as far as efficiency. This will likely change in time On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:41 AM Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a blockchain engineer based out of Singapore working at a leading > bank in ASEAN. > > I am looking to leverage the Hashed-Timelock Agreements (HTLAs) paradigm > for establishing atomicity between different DLT networks for asset swaps > to achieve cross border payments with partial to full decentralization in > mind. > > With the goal in mind, I like to understand technically how can this > paradigm be applied to achieve payment vs payment (pvp) with semi-trusted > nodes such as clearinghouses, banks and individual players? Applying the > same concept of a crypto swap between ETH and BTC, the same can be applied > between SGD and HKD? > > Also, I hope to understand the models around how liquidity can be > maintained between these nodes? > > Thank you! > > Regards, > > Nathan Aw > https://sg.linkedin.com/in/awnathan > https://erc725alliance.org/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 04:39:48 UTC