W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > November 2018

Re: Researching to leverage Hashed-Timelock Agreements (HTLAs) paradigm for establishing atomicity between different DLT networks for asset swaps with full decentralization

From: Ahmed Khaleel <akhaleel@pixelalpha.io>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:35:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHeSACmZYxXLyfrjxbf87qdhXSv4YKAaOz6tZj+7yuek3HOxew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com>
Cc: ledger@ietf.org, public-interledger@w3.org
Theoretically it’s sound but the market liquidity isn’t there yet.  I’m
finishing up an ilp exchanger and working on an exchange next.   I did alot
of experimenting and one solution seems to be the best as far as
efficiency.  This will likely change in time


On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:41 AM Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am a blockchain engineer based out of Singapore working at a leading
> bank in ASEAN.
>
> I am looking to leverage the Hashed-Timelock Agreements (HTLAs) paradigm
> for establishing atomicity between different DLT networks for asset swaps
> to achieve cross border payments with partial to full decentralization in
> mind.
>
> With the goal in mind, I like to understand technically how can this
> paradigm be applied to achieve payment vs payment (pvp) with semi-trusted
> nodes such as clearinghouses, banks and individual players? Applying the
> same concept of a crypto swap between ETH and BTC, the same can be applied
> between SGD and HKD?
>
> Also, I hope to understand the models around how liquidity can be
> maintained between these nodes?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
>
> Nathan Aw
> https://sg.linkedin.com/in/awnathan
> https://erc725alliance.org/
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 04:39:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:13 UTC