- From: Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:03:56 +0800
- To: Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>
- Cc: public-interledger@w3.org, ledger@ietf.org
- Message-ID: <CA+p-ctZ2zkJ1rYAM+1Pj+y10KNiH-MKKeJNh7aS1=EAKr1KrGg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Evan, I came up with a gridlock diagram/scenario to illustrate what I wish to hope to solve (or perhaps build) with interledger. Please refer to the gridlock diagram below. Since interledger is the routing layer/network, the gridlock mechanism is something that will be extremely relevant. This mechanism will be a game-changer -- any thoughts/inputs, please? [image: image.png] Regards, Nathan Aw https://www.linkedin.com/in/awnathan/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-dinrg-decentralized-identity-00 On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 12:22 AM Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com> wrote: > The same construction can be used no matter what the underlying assets > are. They can be cryptocurrencies, fiat currencies, shares of stock or > other divisible assets. > > If you want to use this method for a swap you can send a "payment" from > one of your accounts to another. > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 8:27 AM Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Second try. Thank you. >> >> I am a blockchain engineer based out of Singapore working at a leading >> bank in ASEAN. >> >> I am looking to leverage the Hashed-Timelock Agreements (HTLAs) paradigm >> for establishing atomicity between different DLT networks for asset swaps >> to achieve cross border payments with partial to full decentralization in >> mind. >> >> With the goal in mind, I like to understand technically how can this >> paradigm be applied to achieve payment vs payment (pvp) with semi-trusted >> nodes such as clearinghouses, banks and individual players? Applying the >> same concept of a crypto swap between ETH and BTC, the same can be applied >> between SGD and HKD? >> >> Also, I hope to understand the models around how liquidity can be >> maintained between these nodes? >> >> Regards, >> >> Nathan Aw >> https://sg.linkedin.com/in/awnathan >> >> https://erc725alliance.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 12:39 AM Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am a blockchain engineer based out of Singapore working at a leading >>> bank in ASEAN. >>> >>> I am looking to leverage the Hashed-Timelock Agreements (HTLAs) paradigm >>> for establishing atomicity between different DLT networks for asset swaps >>> to achieve cross border payments with partial to full decentralization in >>> mind. >>> >>> With the goal in mind, I like to understand technically how can this >>> paradigm be applied to achieve payment vs payment (pvp) with semi-trusted >>> nodes such as clearinghouses, banks and individual players? Applying the >>> same concept of a crypto swap between ETH and BTC, the same can be applied >>> between SGD and HKD? >>> >>> Also, I hope to understand the models around how liquidity can be >>> maintained between these nodes? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Nathan Aw >>> https://sg.linkedin.com/in/awnathan >>> https://erc725alliance.org/ >>> >>> >>>
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
- image/png attachment: interledger_gridlock.PNG
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2018 14:04:31 UTC