Re: Atomic payments

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
wrote:

> In my experience to date, it's most often people familiar with existing
> payment systems that want atomic mode. I think that in time we'll find that
> complete end to end atomicity comes at a cost that is not justified for a
> lot of payments.
>

For what it's worth, I see a lot of similarities to Interledger atomic mode
in something like Sprites, which is trying to improve the performance of
Lightning-like payment channels:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.05812.pdf