W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Atomic payments

From: Tony Arcieri <tony@chain.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:13:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CANnD4Aj+7u11qTKgEGHuZ2Vq=gxx_FyK0_otLcuE_btwQEPQ3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>

> In my experience to date, it's most often people familiar with existing
> payment systems that want atomic mode. I think that in time we'll find that
> complete end to end atomicity comes at a cost that is not justified for a
> lot of payments.

For what it's worth, I see a lot of similarities to Interledger atomic mode
in something like Sprites, which is trying to improve the performance of
Lightning-like payment channels:

Received on Friday, 30 June 2017 15:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 30 June 2017 15:14:13 UTC