- From: Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:08:32 -0700
- To: Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>
- Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 06:09:25 UTC
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com> wrote: > > What do you think? Does HTLA get the point across? (If this idea seems > interesting or could use more explanation I could write up a full blog post > about it) > > I like this and think it gets the idea across effectively. You should try it out on people whose brain isn't already filled with this stuff though to be sure. Where were you thinking of using it? I've always liked the idea that any two parties can formalize their own settlement agreement and make it legally binding just by writing it up and signing it (on paper, with ink), or putting in an online service's terms for its users. No fancy distributed ledger stuff needed. I think this could appeal to a whole swath of developers who are (rightly) intimidated by blockchains and smart contracts, especially if there's an easy-to-use little ILP library they can plug right in.
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 06:09:25 UTC