W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > July 2017

Re: [Ledger] Forming a Routing Working Group

From: Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:07:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB1OcyFFAQyNbri-zFz2KYcmeKH0FPcbqFr+FjKsg6fs6f9RVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>
Cc: Interledger Mailing List - IETF <ledger@ietf.org>, Tony Arcieri <tony@chain.com>, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
This approach sounds perfect to me Evan.

Does this sound good to everyone else?

Any other suggestions re efficient/effective collaboration tools?

Evan, will you be sending links to the shared docs etc.?


On Jun 30, 2017 12:14 PM, "Evan Schwartz" <evan@ripple.com> wrote:

Sounds good. I would propose that this type of group should start and work
on a shared set of docs that describes options, ongoing research, etc so
that others can participate and follow along.

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:10 PM Tony Arcieri <tony@chain.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com> wrote:
>> This is a great idea Evan.  I am very interested in routing.  I don't
>> manage calls well, but I would appreciate being able to observe and
>> hopefully participate a bit over email.  Please let us know if/when any new
>> mailing list gets set up for this.  Thanks!
> I'm in a similar boat to Ryan: a big fan of things like BGP and layer 3
> routing as well as proprietary payment network routing, but would prefer to
> participate in something like this a bit more asynchronously as opposed to
> a call.

Evan Schwartz
Software Engineer
Managing Director of Ripple Luxembourg
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 20:07:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 7 July 2017 20:07:57 UTC