W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > November 2016

Re: JSON-B.NET. Was: TJSON

From: Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:51:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPS+YFL3U6i0atKnaY9cATLGaf3HucwP7pM-7SNzH5Yk9O38dA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
I agree with that interface change.  I have questions of why 53?

Andrew B. Brown
(512) 947-8282
http://KidsCourtyard.com


On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Anders Rundgren <
anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pardon for reviving an old thread but I just got a link in my mail-box
> http://json-b.net/
> showing Oracle's take on JSON typing which appears to be identical to mine
> although they
> use a declarative approach while I have settled on a more "old-school"
> programmatic ditto.
>
> However, these methods are in no way mutually exclusive.
>
> Sort of related (and triggered by the TJSON discussion), I upgraded my
> JSON Java library from
>    JSONObjectWriter setLong(String name, long value)
> to
>    JSONObjectWriter setInt53(String name, long value)
> because that reflects what it actually does :-)
>
> Anders
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:51:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:51:52 UTC