W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > November 2016

Re: TJSON

From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:35:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVLR9_3vQ2vRGmvLKY8x0NS4zKbKmmMrqDAsmco-cQ5Vbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:

> Sweet! Upvoted. (Just to be clear though - do you still see a domain
> separation issue with prop 30 - or was that concern related to doing it a
> different way?)
>

It's proposing mandatory postfix tags, so no: if the tags are always
present there's no domain separation issue.

This does include tags that appear redundant at first, including "O" for
object, but this keeps the door open for JSON object syntax to be usable to
represent additional types besides objects.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:36:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:36:46 UTC