Re: TJSON

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:

> Sweet! Upvoted. (Just to be clear though - do you still see a domain
> separation issue with prop 30 - or was that concern related to doing it a
> different way?)
>

It's proposing mandatory postfix tags, so no: if the tags are always
present there's no domain separation issue.

This does include tags that appear redundant at first, including "O" for
object, but this keeps the door open for JSON object syntax to be usable to
represent additional types besides objects.

-- 
Tony Arcieri