Re: TJSON from Stefan Thomas on 2016-11-03 (public-interledger@w3.org from November 2016)

From: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 23:13:31 +0000
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAFpK0Q0g17MoYBXRFAAc1WCGBE+wKoSWyLRwV98HzXNEUdeyrg@mail.gmail.com>

> That's exactly what this proposal does:

Sweet! Upvoted. (Just to be clear though - do you still see a domain
separation issue with prop 30 - or was that concern related to doing it a
different way?)

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:
>
> My solution to that would be to always put the tag in the key, never in
> the value.
>
>
> That's exactly what this proposal does:
>
> https://github.com/tjson/tjson-spec/issues/30
>
>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>

Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:14:13 UTC