W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > November 2016

Re: TJSON

From: Andrew Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 19:22:44 -0400
Message-Id: <B6B3E686-E44E-437D-A9B9-C6E0818B7AAD@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
To: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Do you see a discussion forum as a more collaborative way of communicating?

Look at http://TalkFL.org. I can create a forum for you. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 3, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:
> 
> > That's exactly what this proposal does: 
> 
> Sweet! Upvoted. (Just to be clear though - do you still see a domain separation issue with prop 30 - or was that concern related to doing it a different way?)
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:
>> My solution to that would be to always put the tag in the key, never in the value.
>> 
>> That's exactly what this proposal does: 
>> 
>> https://github.com/tjson/tjson-spec/issues/30
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tony Arcieri
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:23:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:23:19 UTC