- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:13:53 +0100
- To: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_Jn1Ezp0b8wn6gaFiD78fQoW8XxHJG8_uF+6jh7ht7-1Q@mail.gmail.com>
>From the discussion around payment to invoices there appears to be a number of views that the current application layer protocol is not meeting the needs of all B2B use cases. Further, there is a suggestion that there are a number of existing protocols and standards that we should be leveraging. It's important to note that the Interledger architecture is layered, intentionally, to resemble something like the OSI model for communications protocols. At the lowest layers are very simple protocols that have a specific purpose but these build up to an application layer where it is possible to construct a number of application layer protocols that are built on the lower layer primitives and fit for a particular purpose. I'd compare these to communications stack protocols like HTTP and FTP. These two protocols are built on the same underlying IP-based stacks but were designed for very different purposes. Right now OWPS is intended to be a very simple application layer protocol primarily designed to handle P2P payments or very simple C2B payments (i.e. 1:1 payment to invoice). It has very specific design principles which may not be appropriate for a lot of use cases (such as being operatorless). This protocol may evolve but it's unlikely to ever be a rich protocol that incorporates comprehensive stacks like ISO20022 or ebXML. Rather than trying to turn OWPS into a protocol that can handle all use cases I'd suggest there is scope for a more complex and rich application layer protocol that is more targeted at "enterprise" use cases. If there is a willingness within this group to begin developing another application layer protocol that is focused on B2B and leverages existing standards like ebXML. ISO20022 or UBL then that would be great. It is a far larger task than the current group could take on but I'd certainly support it and try to get involved as time allows. Adrian
Received on Monday, 28 March 2016 10:14:21 UTC