On 1 March 2016 at 23:43, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Much also depends on your trust profile, ILP looks like a good solution >> in zero trust environments, but perhaps overkill in some high trust >> environments. >> > > I look at ILP this way: > > - Atomic Mode is for high trust environments, i.e. moving millions of > dollars per transaction (As I actually work in environments that demand > this, I personally find Atomic Mode more interesting) > - Universal Mode is for scenarios which are "high trust" (you seem to be > advocating what I call the "cadbury cream egg" philosophy of security: a > tough exterior and a gooey cream center, an approach I am philosophically > opposed to, but I digress) > > Do you have specific complaints about why you think Universal Mode is > overkill? > Not at this point, no. I'll be able to give a more detailed opinion after implementation. I think after you solve a problem in a few different ways it's easier to give an analysis of the tradeoffs. > > -- > Tony Arcieri >
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:48:09 UTC