W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Mistake in whitepaper?

From: Jan <jan.h.xie@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:13:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CANwb015soNvjMCnqq6-P8DCvU2yQmadAnC-Y2ThM_ot9q4nWGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Cool, thanks for the great work!

A suggestion: do you think it's good to put the whitepaper on github for
easy collaboration?

Jan

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:

> Hey Jan,
>
> You're totally right, good catch. Evan and I went in and fixed it - thanks
> for reporting!
>
> - Stefan
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Jan <jan.h.xie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> in "3.4.3 Preparation":
>>
>> > The sender p_1 first authorizes and sends the instruction to
>> > prepare the first transfer b_1 on l_1 . p_1 then requests that
>> > the first connector p_2 prepare b_2 on l_2 . The connector
>> > p_2 is comfortable preparing b_2 because b_1 is prepared
>> > and the funds have been escrowed by l_1 . Similarly, each
>> > connector p_i prepares transfer b_{i-1} once it is notified that
>> > l_i has prepared b_i and escrowed the corresponding funds.
>>
>> It looks like the last description is reversed, correction:
>>
>> > each connector p_i prepares transfer b_i once it is notified that
>> > l_{i-1} has prepared b_{i-1} and ...
>>
>> Not sure if this is the place to post this ..
>>
>> Regards
>> Jan
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 04:14:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 10 February 2016 04:14:38 UTC