W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Mistake in whitepaper?

From: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:48:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFpK0Q2NkirTb3OJh9KczQtdEjCMf65nq2yVtz87r7bomK1Rcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jan <jan.h.xie@gmail.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Hey Jan,

You're totally right, good catch. Evan and I went in and fixed it - thanks
for reporting!

- Stefan

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Jan <jan.h.xie@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> in "3.4.3 Preparation":
>
> > The sender p_1 first authorizes and sends the instruction to
> > prepare the first transfer b_1 on l_1 . p_1 then requests that
> > the first connector p_2 prepare b_2 on l_2 . The connector
> > p_2 is comfortable preparing b_2 because b_1 is prepared
> > and the funds have been escrowed by l_1 . Similarly, each
> > connector p_i prepares transfer b_{i-1} once it is notified that
> > l_i has prepared b_i and escrowed the corresponding funds.
>
> It looks like the last description is reversed, correction:
>
> > each connector p_i prepares transfer b_i once it is notified that
> > l_{i-1} has prepared b_{i-1} and ...
>
> Not sure if this is the place to post this ..
>
> Regards
> Jan
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 18:49:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 February 2016 18:49:25 UTC