Re: [User Context] Requesting WG review for FPWD of Indie UI: User Content

Sure. That's probably a good prerequisite.


On May 5, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Janina, 
> 
> Do you want the privacy people to look at this first before it goes out?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> 
> James Craig ---05/03/2014 10:19:15 PM---I believe I have the User Context spec in decent shape for a first public working draft, so I'm requ
> 
> From:	James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
> To:	Indie UI <public-indie-ui@w3.org>
> Cc:	Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
> Date:	05/03/2014 10:19 PM
> Subject:	[User Context] Requesting WG review for FPWD of Indie UI: User Content
> 
> 
> 
> I believe I have the User Context spec in decent shape for a first public working draft, so I'm requesting Working Group members review it in preparation. Janina and Michael have set a tentative FPWD publish date in late May (or was it June?), and Janina will send out the formal call-for-consensus sometime closer to the publish date.
> 
> I made some significant additions to the IndieUI privacy model and screen reader settings today related to ACTION-80. The rest of the document hasn't changed much recently.
> 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html
> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 5 May 2014 22:38:52 UTC