Agree
* katie *
Katie Haritos-Shea @ GMAIL
On May 5, 2014 6:38 PM, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> Sure. That's probably a good prerequisite.
>
>
> On May 5, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> Janina,
>
> Do you want the privacy people to look at this first before it goes out?
>
> Rich
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for James Craig ---05/03/2014 10:19:15
> PM---I believe I have the User Context spec in decent shape for a]James
> Craig ---05/03/2014 10:19:15 PM---I believe I have the User Context spec in
> decent shape for a first public working draft, so I'm requ
>
> From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
> To: Indie UI <public-indie-ui@w3.org>
> Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
> Date: 05/03/2014 10:19 PM
> Subject: [User Context] Requesting WG review for FPWD of Indie UI: User
> Content
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I believe I have the User Context spec in decent shape for a first public
> working draft, so I'm requesting Working Group members review it in
> preparation. Janina and Michael have set a tentative FPWD publish date in
> late May (or was it June?), and Janina will send out the formal
> call-for-consensus sometime closer to the publish date.
>
> I made some significant additions to the IndieUI privacy model and screen
> reader settings today related to ACTION-80. The rest of the document hasn't
> changed much recently.
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html
>
>
>
>
>
