- From: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:24:53 +0000
- To: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com>
- CC: Jon Piesing <Jon.Piesing@tpvision.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, W3C Inband Tracks Reflector <public-inbandtracks@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
On 10/6/14, 4:58 AM, "Alexander Adolf" <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com> wrote: >Dear Bob, > >On 2014-09-29, at 23:51 , Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> One other comment. I©öm looking at this document >> >>http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300468/01.11.01_60/en_3 >>00 >> 468v011101p.pdf as the DVB_SI reference. Is that correct. > >The current link can always be found at > > https://www.dvb.org/standards > >or > > http://www.etsi.org/standards-search Thanks. > >But for what we are discussing, the latest and greatest version is not >required. > >> Rather than >> using a localBiblio in the sourcing spec, we©öve been updating the master >> respec database https://github.com/tobie/specref. Please do a pull >>request >> to add your DVB references. >> [...] > >I have a fork waiting to be pull-requested here: > > https://github.com/c-alpha/specref > >I was hesitant to submit the pull request before we had consensus that >the proposed changed would be incorporate one or the other way at all. > >If you prefer, I can submit the pull request now, at the risk of adding >unused entries to the database (if that'd be a concern at all). I don¡¯t think there is any question that the specific methods you¡¯ve proposed for DVB specific rules for sourcing tracks will go in so I¡¯d go ahead and add the reference. It can always be removed by a PR. Thanks, Bob > >Many thanks and cheers, > > --alexander
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 14:25:33 UTC