- From: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:58:55 +0200
- To: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
- Cc: Jon Piesing <Jon.Piesing@tpvision.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, W3C Inband Tracks Reflector <public-inbandtracks@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Dear Bob,
On 2014-09-29, at 23:51 , Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com> wrote:
> [...]
> One other comment. Išm looking at this document
> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300468/01.11.01_60/en_300
> 468v011101p.pdf as the DVB_SI reference. Is that correct.
The current link can always be found at
https://www.dvb.org/standards
or
http://www.etsi.org/standards-search
But for what we are discussing, the latest and greatest version is not required.
> Rather than
> using a localBiblio in the sourcing spec, wešve been updating the master
> respec database https://github.com/tobie/specref. Please do a pull request
> to add your DVB references.
> [...]
I have a fork waiting to be pull-requested here:
https://github.com/c-alpha/specref
I was hesitant to submit the pull request before we had consensus that the proposed changed would be incorporate one or the other way at all.
If you prefer, I can submit the pull request now, at the risk of adding unused entries to the database (if that'd be a concern at all).
Many thanks and cheers,
--alexander
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 10:59:23 UTC