Re: Call for Consensus (CFC) on the new Charter

Hi Mounir,

This PR was made in response,
https://github.com/w3c/immersive-web-wg-charter/pull/31

We didn't take on all the suggestions because we wanted to maintain our
flexibility for now, as
we are still working out how best to systematically move work from
incubation to the WG.

Are you okay with this charter moving forward?

Ada

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 01:14, Mounir Lamouri <mlamouri@google.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the charter. This looks great!
>
> I was wondering if we could add more details around the "optional"
> deliverables to explain a bit more the process for them to move to the
> Working Group. Maybe having a different sub-section would also make sense
> (2.2 Potential Normative Specifications?). I would recommend following the
> example of the Media WG charter
> <https://www.w3.org/2019/05/media-wg-charter.html> but I may be biased.
>
> -- Mounir
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 10:24, Ada Rose Cannon <ada@ada.is> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Hopefully you are aware about the plans to put forward a new Charter,
>> Chris and Atsushi have been working on it.
>> Incorporating the feedback from the recent face to face meeting in
>> Seattle.
>>
>> Here is the current version, this CFC is for one week, then we will carry
>> on with the long chartering process.
>>
>>
>> https://w3c.github.io/immersive-web-wg-charter/immersive-web-wg-charter.html
>>
>> Ada Rose Cannon & Chris Wilson,
>> Co-chairs of the W3C Immersive Web Working Group
>>
>