Re: Call for Consensus (CFC) on the new Charter

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 08:49, Ada Rose Cannon <ada@ada.is> wrote:

> Hi Mounir,
>
> This PR was made in response,
> https://github.com/w3c/immersive-web-wg-charter/pull/31
>
> We didn't take on all the suggestions because we wanted to maintain our
> flexibility for now, as
> we are still working out how best to systematically move work from
> incubation to the WG.
>
> Are you okay with this charter moving forward?
>

Yes


> Ada
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 01:14, Mounir Lamouri <mlamouri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the charter. This looks great!
>>
>> I was wondering if we could add more details around the "optional"
>> deliverables to explain a bit more the process for them to move to the
>> Working Group. Maybe having a different sub-section would also make sense
>> (2.2 Potential Normative Specifications?). I would recommend following the
>> example of the Media WG charter
>> <https://www.w3.org/2019/05/media-wg-charter.html> but I may be biased.
>>
>> -- Mounir
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 10:24, Ada Rose Cannon <ada@ada.is> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> Hopefully you are aware about the plans to put forward a new Charter,
>>> Chris and Atsushi have been working on it.
>>> Incorporating the feedback from the recent face to face meeting in
>>> Seattle.
>>>
>>> Here is the current version, this CFC is for one week, then we will
>>> carry on with the long chartering process.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://w3c.github.io/immersive-web-wg-charter/immersive-web-wg-charter.html
>>>
>>> Ada Rose Cannon & Chris Wilson,
>>> Co-chairs of the W3C Immersive Web Working Group
>>>
>>