- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:19:18 +0100
- To: "public-idcg@w3.org" <public-idcg@w3.org>
Everyone, One of the ideas on the wiki is an Equality Review Board (ERB). I think it is definitely something we should work towards, but of all our ideas it is the one I think we should be most cautious about doing before we have better representation ourselves. We've already talked today about ways we can invite people from under-represented groups to join this CG, and the need to phrase the invitation carefully so we do not give the impression that we're trying to offload the hard work onto other people. As we start to do more outreach we will hopefully reach a point where we have enough diversity ourselves to look more seriously at forming an ERB. In the meantime I wonder if we could take a step in the right direction by helping members of our community review what they're working on themselves? Some of the horizontal review groups at W3C have developed self-review checklists - relatively short sets of questions designed to help WG participants and specification editors consider their work in a different light. I know the TAG has also had success using self-review questionnaires. I have not got any further with thinking about this idea, but wanted to share it in case it was something we might choose to do. Léonie. -- Director @TetraLogical
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2020 17:19:35 UTC