- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:57:14 -0400
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, lwatson@tetralogical.com, "public-idcg@w3.org" <public-idcg@w3.org>
Hi Leonie, Jeff, On 6/11/2020 8:35 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > > On 6/11/2020 3:54 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: >> On 11/06/2020 07:17, Judy Brewer wrote: >>> Leonie, thanks for pulling together a meeting of the Inclusion and >>> Diversity Community Group. >> Thanks for your suggestions Judy. I just want to respond to your first >> point to give some clarification for other members of the CG. >> >>> All, I'm particularly hoping we can discuss elements of a multi-point >>> plan of action, even if part of our discussion is focused on a possible >>> W3C statement. >> We need to be very careful about how we refer to any statement this CG >> might make. We cannot make a statement on behalf of the W3C because we >> cannot speak for the W3C as a whole, so we should probably avoid >> describing it as a "W3C statement". >> >> If we choose to make a statement as the ID CG we still have to be very >> clear that it is not the official position of the W3C; not least because >> I understand the W3C's official position on policy matters such as this, >> is that it has no position. > > At the risk of being pedantic... > > I'm not sure that we have "no position" on the matter. > > It is rather that on certain types of matters that we are not allowed > to express a position. > >> >> If you think the W3C should take an official position on policy matters >> such as BLM, I urge you to take it up with your AC rep if your >> organisation is a member, because it will take a concerted effort by the >> membership to change the W3C's approach. > +1 >> If you don't work for/with a >> member organisation, you can contact a member of the AB instead [1]. I guess I'm thinking in a slightly different direction on this question. I'm keenly aware of past debates about whether W3C can make statements, and appreciate that there may be good reasons for why that is difficult. I'm therefore less interested in pushing the question of what W3C as an organization says publicly, but very interested in what discussions we're willing to have, what we're willing to develop plans for together, and what we commit to do as a broad web community. And in that regard, I'm glad to signs of a closer examination on racial aspects of diversity, equity and inclusion in the tech field, and in W3C; and more brainstorming on ways to improve things. If out of this brainstorming we can come up with a W3C action plan, then at some point that's simply a news item (just as with the annual CEO blog update on diversity today [1] which you've also already highlighted Leonie) and which mentions that this discussion is beginning in the IDCG. I wonder how many different aspects of potential actions we could get agreement to move ahead on? Thank you to those who are continuing to contribute ideas. - Judy [1] https://www.w3.org/blog/2020/06/diversity-and-inclusion-at-w3c-2020-update-future-of-the-w3c-diversity-fund/ >> >> Léonie. >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/ab/ >> >> >> >>> It may seem hard at first to figure out what W3C can do for an action >>> plan given that we're an international technology consortium. But on >>> other aspects of diversity, including disability and gender, W3C has >>> made some progress over the years, even though we often questioned >>> whether any particular step would have an impact, and even though >>> there's lots more to do. On racial justice issues I'm hoping that we >>> can >>> think broadly when considering possible actions across the W3C >>> community. Here are some possible ideas to brainstorm on, mostly >>> phrased >>> as questions. I'd welcome discussion on these on the IDCG list, in >>> meetings, and in any other W3C fora, and also an expansion of an ideas >>> list that might provide us good options to turn into an action plan. >>> Some of these repeat a few things already mentioned on the list, and I >>> also haven't captured them all. >>> >>> 1. _*Principles and practices*_: W3C has the TAG's *Ethical Web >>> Principles* [1]; does anything in that that need updating to better >>> capture current issues? W3C also has a proposed new version of the >>> *Code >>> of Ethics and Professional Conduct* (CEPC) [2] currently under Advisory >>> Committee review, which goes into more detail on racism than the >>> previous version. >>> >>> 2. _*Learning*_: There are many reading lists which have useful >>> resources for learning about racism. It can also be useful to look >>> specifically at the intersection of racism and technology, such as this >>> list from Venture Beat [3]. Are there other reading lists on racism and >>> technology that we could pull together, and perhaps curate a list that >>> could serve as a resource for the web community? >>> >>> 3. _*Discussion*_: We can let W3C colleagues know about discussions >>> within the Inclusion and Diversity Community Group [4], and also >>> encourage discussions in other W3C settings. For instance, do we >>> want to >>> promote this as a discussion topic for our upcoming TPAC? Other events? >>> >>> 4. _*Participation*_: W3C doesn't do a lot of hiring, but occasionally >>> does, and many of our member organizations do. Do hiring managers know >>> where to reach out to to increase the diversity of candidate pools, and >>> could that information be shared? >>> >>> 5. _*Outreach*_: What conferences and events do we all show up to, and >>> with what messages? Early on a few women in standards organizations >>> started showing up to conferences such as the Grace Hopper >>> Conference on >>> Women and Computing, and talking to women engineers about what's so >>> compelling about working in standards organizations. They had not heard >>> of these opportunities from their managers or colleagues, and it took >>> some spreading the word. Maybe finding different venues and talking >>> about participation in standards organizations would be relevant around >>> race as well. >>> >>> 6. _*Work areas*_: Are there any particular topics or issues that we're >>> missing work on, such as AI bias around race? And looking at >>> intersectional issues may be useful as well -- for instance, the >>> intersection of racial and cultural issues with disability can doubly >>> disenfranchise people from the training and mentoring opportunities >>> that >>> help bring people into the field. Are there intersections between race >>> and other areas of W3C work that we could explore? >>> >>> 7. _*Individuals*_, _*organizations and communities*_: People have >>> already raised ideas around diversity scholarships, and/or equipment >>> support, for individuals. Could we broaden this approach to encouraging >>> the web community to look for coaching, mentoring, partnering and >>> support opportunities with local community organizations that could >>> help >>> feed a pipeline of engagement? >>> >>> 8. _*International context*_: Anti-black racism is an issue in many >>> countries especially at this moment, and needs focused attention. >>> But we >>> should probably also continue to work on how this fits within braoder >>> diversity issues that that W3C has worked on worldwide. >>> >>> 9. *_Action Plan?_* Some of these ideas may not be a good fit for W3C, >>> and a lot of other good ideas may be missing. If we think ahead a year, >>> what kind of progress would we want to be able report, and what among >>> these possibilities -- or other possibilities -- might help get us >>> there? Anyone interested in starting to build an action plan from these >>> or similar ideas? >>> >>> - Judy >>> >>> _*Refs*_ >>> >>> 1. W3C TAG Ethical Web Principles: >>> https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles-20191204 >>> 2. Proposed new version of Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct: >>> https://www.w3.org/2020/05/CEPC >>> 3. Some essential reading and research on race and technology: >>> https://venturebeat.com/2020/06/02/some-essential-reading-and-research-on-race-and-technology/ >>> 4. Inclusion and Diversity Community Group (IDCG): >>> https://www.w3.org/community/idcg >>> <https://www.w3.org/community/idcg/> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Judy Brewer >>> Director, Web Accessibility Initiative >>> at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) >>> 105 Broadway, Room 7-128, MIT/CSAIL >>> Cambridge MA 02142 USA >>> www.w3.org/WAI/ >>> > -- Judy Brewer Director, Web Accessibility Initiative at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 105 Broadway, Room 7-128, MIT/CSAIL Cambridge MA 02142 USA www.w3.org/WAI/
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 19:57:23 UTC