- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:33:05 +1000
- To: public-idcg@w3.org
I believe it is the case that without reaching explicit agreement from the membership on such a topic, W3C doesn't have an agreed position. Although many members, staff, and individual collaborators express a position it often happens that W3C - as an explicit decision - doesn't try to spend its time agreeing a "positioning statement". Where it agrees on doing something - like setting up and applying its CEPC - it seems the preference is to let actions speak. cheers On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:35:40 +1000, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 6/11/2020 3:54 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: >> If we choose to make a statement as the ID CG we still have to be very >> clear that it is not the official position of the W3C; not least because >> I understand the W3C's official position on policy matters such as this, >> is that it has no position. > > At the risk of being pedantic... > > I'm not sure that we have "no position" on the matter. > > It is rather that on certain types of matters that we are not allowed to > express a position. cheers -- Charles "chaals" Nevile PegaSys Standards Architect, ConsenSys
Received on Friday, 12 June 2020 03:33:23 UTC