Re: New Proposal Status

Hi Greg and all, I have to say that it is not my personal words and 
opinion. The following is voice of 5 Mongolian linguists, 10 Bolorsoft 
staff (who are developing Mongolianscript), Amarjargal Lkhamsuren (who 
developed some mongolian fonts), Erdenechimeg Myatav (Author of TR170), 
Jargal Badagarov (Buryat linguist) and Jamyansuren Onolt (Great font 
designer/font anatomist, philologist and calligrapher). First of all, we 
would like to thank Greg Eck, Richard Ishida, Andrew West, Richard 
Wordingham, Michel Suignard, Kamal Mansour, Deborah Anderson, Almas 
staff and all contributors for your efforts and activities for 
supporting Mongolian script. A criticism without solution or proof or 
suggestion is blame otherwise it's gold. Thus, every point is suggested. 
We have checked current status of DS01 and it is absolute no-go for the 
following reasons: 1. The third medial form of 1820 must be second init 
form of 1820. (Titim=crown in middle is inconceivable.) 2. switch the 
third initial and Second Initial Form 182C. 3. switch the third Initial 
Form and second Initial Form of 182D. 4. The third medial form of 182D 
must be second final form of 1820. (Segul=tail in middle is 
inconceivable.) 5. The third medial form of 1828 must be second final 
form of 1828. (Segul=tail in middle is inconceivable.) 6. switch the 
final first and the second final form of 1823. (The final form of 1823 
is only occurred in foreign words and this form is current second final 
form.) 7. Where is final forms of 182C? 8. How did you consider and 
follow suggestions of Erdenechimeg Myatav, who is pioneer of Mongolian 
script issues. 
We strictly follow above rules and suggestions. Greg, please squarely 
consider our recommendations and suggestions. I hope that you don't 
treat above suggestions stepmotherly, like my previous comments and 
suggestions. Cheers, Badral Sanlig and et al. On 05.01.2016 15:12, Greg 
Eck wrote:
> Greetings in the New Year …
> Here is a status on the NP:
> We are current on the Ishida Font Comparator Site.
> We are current on the DS01 (as attached).
> I am looking at calling in at the next Unicode Conference in late January.
> There is a document listing changes that I am preparing now – 
> basically covering the yellow/magenta/grey items in the DS01.
> The version of DS01 being submitted will see the grey items either 
> disappear or turn magenta.
> I am waiting to hear back from Professor Quejingzhabu on some specific 
> questions related to the Chinese Standard.
> I just realized that I forgot to mark the proposed changes on the two 
> Baludas (U+1885/6) and will do that on the submitted DS01.
> Can I ask from several of you:
> Kamal, Badral, Jirimutu – have you had time to look over the items in 
> the DS01 in yellow/magenta? Do you have any comments/concerns? Can I 
> say that you are in agreement with the document?
> Everyone: You might want to take another look at the Font Comparator 
> Site also under your font column and just make sure that we are 
> representing your font performance correctly. If you have corrections, 
> you can submit them directly to me. I will collect them and pass them 
> as one bundle to Richard I.
> Thanks,
> Greg

Badral Sanlig, Software architect |
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2016 21:16:10 UTC