- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:03:01 +0100
- To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
- Message-ID: <564DF2B5.8030709@bolorsoft.com>
Hi Greg, The "separated medial form" is not my term. I don't know what it means. This term has been appeared in Jirimutu's email. Badral On 19.11.2015 15:59, Greg Eck wrote: > > Hi Badral, > > Can you give an image of the “separated medial form” so that we are > crystal clear on which glyph we are talking about? > > I am not sure what this is referring to. > > Thanks, > Greg > > >>>>> > > *Sent:*Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:31 PM > *Subject:* Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants > > We have decided, that we don't change our implementation (BS column) > of medial default form of DA, NA, GA due to following reasons. > 1. Logic and Ambiguation > I already mentioned the representation logic in my previous emails. > Now plus: > NA is distinguished only by dot from A. > GA is distinguished only by dot from QA. > DA is distinguished only by horizontal tie from TA. > > 2. Established almost no destabilization > As Jirimutu described there exist almost no destabilization because no > FVSs stored in middle of a word. > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0123.html > (cutting: > > Actually we are not typing and storing FVS1 in the complete Mongolian Word actually, > It is automatically been selecting correct display form in the word. > Only when we show the separated Medial Form individually, the FVS1 is necessary. > For this reason, maybe you are misunderstanding the encodings. > > ) > I didn't understand what is the separated Medial Form. If it's not > ISOLATED one, then we should use ZWJ or? > In our stem database, there exist no stem in middle form of DA, NA, GA > with FVSx. The most words in Greg's example are initial DA which is > also stored in our DB with FVS1 except suffixes. (Dun and Dugnelt > stored in our DB also with FVS because it's an initial second form of DA.) > I think, the misunderstanding was established by magic of OT grammar. > The actual problem could be just changing OT grammar rules for font > developers. If someone has difficulties, we are ready to help. > Can you accept it Jirimutu? > > Greg: Please accept and update your NP column as we requested unless > you have contra arguments. > > cheers, > Badral > >>>>> > -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 16:03:33 UTC