- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:05:56 +0100
- To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Hi Greg, I requested it early enough. Could you recognize it under https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0052.html ? It is not just historical reason. It's not pre-classical form. Some few teacher, who apparently high qualified, still today teaches genitive case with this form in Mongolia. Badral On 14.11.2015 04:55, Greg Eck wrote: > Hi Siqin, > > We are closing the door on new additions pretty quick. > There will always be more :). > > Could I ask two things ... > 1.) Could you translate the note from Professor Kuribayashi from Japanese into English so that we can have his thoughts on record. > 2.) The images do show the dot, but are highly pixelated and unclear. Could you rescan the documents at a higher resolution and resend. Regardless of whether we can do anything at this point, it will be helpful to have the images on file in a shaper resolution. > 3.) Comment on the period that the dotted U/UE is found in. > > Thanks, > Greg > > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:07 AM > Subject: Re: U+1824 & U+1826 > > I found sample of genetive dotted U+1824 and U+1826 in old mongolian document. > u_ue_with_dot_11.jpg > u_ue_with_dot_12.jpg > u_ue_with_dot_13.jpg > u_ue_with_dot_14.jpg > u_ue_with_dot_15.jpg > I also received request from Professor Kuribayashi about dotted U+1824 and U+1826 with NNBSP. > request_from_kuribayashi.jpg > > So, it is better to have a dotted Isolate U+1824 and U+1826, I think. > > SiqinBilige -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2015 11:06:28 UTC