Re: U+1824 & U+1826

Hi Greg,
I requested it early enough. Could you recognize it under 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0052.html 
?
It is not just historical reason. It's not pre-classical form. Some few 
teacher, who apparently high qualified, still today teaches genitive 
case with this form in Mongolia.

Badral

On 14.11.2015 04:55, Greg Eck wrote:
> Hi Siqin,
>
> We are closing the door on new additions pretty quick.
> There will always be more :).
>
> Could I ask two things ...
> 1.) Could you translate the note from Professor Kuribayashi from Japanese into English so that we can have his thoughts on record.
> 2.) The images do show the dot, but are highly pixelated and unclear. Could you rescan the documents at a higher resolution and resend. Regardless of whether we can do anything at this point, it will be helpful to have the images on file in a shaper resolution.
> 3.) Comment on the period that the dotted U/UE is found in.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:07 AM
> Subject: Re: U+1824 & U+1826
>
> I found sample of genetive dotted U+1824 and U+1826 in old mongolian document.
>       u_ue_with_dot_11.jpg
>       u_ue_with_dot_12.jpg
>       u_ue_with_dot_13.jpg
>       u_ue_with_dot_14.jpg
>       u_ue_with_dot_15.jpg
> I also received request from Professor Kuribayashi about dotted U+1824 and U+1826 with NNBSP.
>       request_from_kuribayashi.jpg
>
> So, it is better to have a dotted Isolate U+1824 and U+1826, I think.
>
> SiqinBilige


-- 
Badral Sanlig, Software architect
www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar

Received on Saturday, 14 November 2015 11:06:28 UTC