Re: 1877 - Manchu advice needed

Hi Greg,

> But, the middle form of sibe and manchu is not same.
>     manchu_zha02.jpg
>     sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg
> So, it is better to have two middle forms of zha(U+1877), I think.

I didn't realize that there is sibe zha(1872).
never mind.

SiqinBilige.

On 2015/10/21 11:17, siqin wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Acording to the alphabet table of sibe and manchu, there is no 
> existence of final form of the zha(U+1877).
>     manchu_zha01.jpg
>     manchu_zha02.jpg
>
>     sibe_zha01_children.jpg
>     sibe_zha02_children.jpg
>     sibe_zha03_children.jpg
>
>     sibe_zha11_teacher.jpg
>     sibe_zha12_teacher.jpg
>     sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg
>     sibe_zha14_teacher.jpg
>
> But, the middle form of sibe and manchu is not same.
>     manchu_zha02.jpg
>     sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg
> So, it is better to have two middle forms of zha(U+1877), I think.
>
> SiqinBilige
>
>
> On 2015/10/21 10:12, Greg Eck wrote:
>>
>> Jirimutu – do you have any examples for the tailed glyph at U+1877 final?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> mailbox:///D:/siqin/Thunderbird/Profiles/b1ym75zh.default/Mail/Local%20Folders/w3?number=64727177&header=quotebody&part=1.2&filename=image001.jpg
>>
>