RE: about sibe, manchu second isolate i

Yes, both U+185E and U+1873 Final need to be processed as a suffix following the NNBSP. And yes, if we are consistent, then these are really isolates! I agree with you. That is a good insight.

Greg

>>>>>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:57 PM
Subject: about sibe, manchu second isolate i

It is better to has a second isolate sibe i (185E) and manchu i (1873).
     sibe_isolate_i_01.JPG
     sibe_isolate_i_02.jpg
     manchu_isolate_i_01.jpg

Or, need U+202F+i(185E) and U+202F+i(1873) usage in sibe and manchu.

SiqinBilige.
>>>>>

Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 14:16:33 UTC