W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Sibe Range Head Forms, Postional Forms, Variant Forms - Final Looks

From: siqin <siqin@almas.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:15:29 +0900
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56247C71.9010901@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg,

I found that mvs+a(final_a+FVS2) used in early manchu document.
     manchu_a_e_01.jpg
     manchu_a_e_02.jpg

If it is true, may be mvs+e(U+185D, final_e+FVS2) is needed.

SiqinBilige.

On 2015/10/18 17:22, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> We are past the Todo range now and looking at the Sibe range.
>
> The default isolates are still in disarray 
>
> One question that I have had  two actually 
>
> 1.)U+185D shows one variant  I have in my notes to watch to another 
> final variant to show up  does anyone have any evidence of more than 
> two glyphs for the final position at U+185D?
>
> 2.)Same question is raised for U+1860  I have in my notes to watch 
> for an undotted form of the 1860 Final+FVS2  does anyone have a 
> comment on this?
>
> Greg
>


manchu_a_e_02.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: manchu_a_e_02.jpg)

manchu_a_e_01.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: manchu_a_e_01.jpg)

Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 05:15:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:44 UTC