Hi Greg,
I found that mvs+a(final_a+FVS2) used in early manchu document.
manchu_a_e_01.jpg
manchu_a_e_02.jpg
If it is true, may be mvs+e(U+185D, final_e+FVS2) is needed.
SiqinBilige.
On 2015/10/18 17:22, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> We are past the Todo range now and looking at the Sibe range.
>
> The default isolates are still in disarray …
>
> One question that I have had – two actually …
>
> 1.)U+185D shows one variant – I have in my notes to watch to another
> final variant to show up – does anyone have any evidence of more than
> two glyphs for the final position at U+185D?
>
> 2.)Same question is raised for U+1860 – I have in my notes to watch
> for an undotted form of the 1860 Final+FVS2 – does anyone have a
> comment on this?
>
> Greg
>
