Re: U+1824 & U+1826

Sorry, a small correction: This form is an alternative variant of
genitive case.

On 15.10.2015 12:51, Badral S. wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> I just checked again
> and found an issue at U+1824/1826.
> If we should filter FVS-s strictly, then we should probably consider u &
> ue with drop which occurs after NA alternatively.
> @Siqin & Jirumutu: Is this form exists in Inner Mongolia? If yes, how
> popular is it?
> Badral

Badral Sanlig, Software architect |
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar

Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 10:57:32 UTC