RE: Two Final Threads - Diphthongs / Final glyph checks

Hi All,

 

It is my typing mistake, because I was very tired in Hohhot when I write last mail, because my dad sick in hospital.

I had found only 30 min to replayed that mail.

Sorry about it.

 

It should be 

1.      The first medial form  of U+1836_Y is ,  encoded as <U+1836>

2.      The second medial form of U+1836_Y is , encoded as <U+1836, FVS1>

3.      The first medial form  of U+1838_W is  ,  encoded as <U+1838>

4.      The second medial form of U+1838_W is , encoded as <U+1838, FVS1>

 

And we will 

1 . Encode  ᠠᠢᠯ as <U+1820><U+1822><U+182F>,   not as <U+1820><U+1836><U+1822><U+182F>

2 . Encode  ᠰᠠᠢᠬᠠᠨ as <U+1830><U+1820><U+1822><U+182C><U+1820><U+1828>,   not as <U+1830><U+1820><U+1836><U+1822><U+182C><U+1820><U+1828>

3 . Encode  ᠰᠠᠶ᠋ᠢᠬᠠᠨ as <U+1830><U+1820><U+1836><U+1822><U+182C><U+1820><U+1828>,   not as <U+1830><U+1820><U+1836, FVS1><U+1822><U+182C><U+1820><U+1828>

4 . Encode  ᠳᠠᠢ as <U+1832><U+1820><U+1822>,   not as <U+1832><U+1820><U+1836>

 

All of above is acceptable to all parties, there will be no need to discuss more on Diphthongs things. It is linguistic opinion. 

 

What we have agreed on NNBSP connected suffixes  Yin, YI, IYER, IYEN is the exception, and on for Suffixes.

 

Thanks and Best Regards, 

 

 

 

Jirimutu

===============================================================

Almas Inc. 

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/

http://www.mongolfont.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------

 

Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd.

010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia

Mail:  jirimutu@delehi.com       Mobile:18647152148

Phone:  +86-471-6661969,      Ofiice： +86-471-6661995

http://www.delehi.com/

===============================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. Dürst [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 1:18 PM
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp; 'Greg Eck' <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: Re: Two Final Threads - Diphthongs / Final glyph checks

 

Dear Mongolian Experts,

 

On 2015/10/13 11:42,  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote:

> Hi Greg,

> 

> 

> 

> Mr. Liang Jin Bao’s paper is talking a lot linguistic arguments.

> 

> 

> 

> But the major point of argument is how to define the Medial Form Glyph of the two character U+1836_Y and U+1838_W.

> 

> 

> 

> It should be

> 

> 1.      The first medial form  of U+1836_Y is ,  encoded as <U+1836>

> 

> 2.      The second medial form of U1836_Y is , encoded as <U1836, FVS1>

> 

> 3.      The first medial form  of U+1838_W is  ,  encoded as <U+1836>

 

Probably just an oversight, but shouldn't this be "encoded as <U+1838> ?

 

> 4.      The second medial form of U1838_W is , encoded as <U1836, FVS1>

 

Likewise here, "encoded as <U+1838, FVS1> ?

 

Regards,   Martin.