Re: Two Final Threads - Diphthongs / Final glyph checks from Martin J. Dürst on 2015-10-13 (public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org from October to December 2015)

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:17:44 +0900
To: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>, 'Greg Eck' <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <561C85E8.8070402@it.aoyama.ac.jp>

Dear Mongolian Experts,

On 2015/10/13 11:42, jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Mr. Liang Jin Bao’s paper is talking a lot linguistic arguments.
>
>
>
> But the major point of argument is how to define the Medial Form Glyph of the two character U+1836_Y and U+1838_W.
>
>
>
> It should be
>
> 1.      The first medial form  of U+1836_Y is ,  encoded as <U+1836>
>
> 2.      The second medial form of U1836_Y is , encoded as <U1836, FVS1>
>
> 3.      The first medial form  of U+1838_W is  ,  encoded as <U+1836>

Probably just an oversight, but shouldn't this be "encoded as <U+1838> ?

> 4.      The second medial form of U1838_W is , encoded as <U1836, FVS1>

Likewise here, "encoded as <U+1838, FVS1> ?

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 04:18:29 UTC