- From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:05:19 +0100
- To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Cc: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:55:06 +0000 Greg Eck <greck@postone.net> wrote: > This is the DS01 third medial form or the Todo-specific medial NA. > I am not sure where the notion of it being constructed as > <ZWJ><180A><1828><ZWJ>. If anything we might represent it as > <ZWJ><1828><180D><ZWJ>. Greg The problem is that GB/T 26226-2010 Table A defines this as undotted NA, while Table B defines it as the 'Todo-specific' medial NA. What is the grammatical trigger for this form? I got the impression it occurred at morpheme boundaries. >> >>>>> >> Table B of GB/T 26226-2010 does not contain the medial 'separate >> form' >> of NA. Conceivably, it has been reanalysed as NIRUGU + medial NA. >> >>>>> I had already retracted the above and stated that in fact it wasn't missing from Table B. Richard.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2015 21:05:57 UTC