- From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:06:13 +0100
- To: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:31:22 +0100 Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Table B of GB/T 26226-2010 does not contain the medial 'separate form' > of NA. Conceivably, it has been reanalysed as NIRUGU + medial NA. I am wrong. It does. It's over the page from the other entries for NA and out of order. NA is not the only letter for which entries are out of order, so that is an explanation but not an excuse. I am now uncertain as to how GB/T 26226-2010 requires one to render medial <NA, FVS3>. Richard.
Received on Monday, 31 August 2015 12:06:55 UTC