W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

【Corrected:】 FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:01:41 +0900
To: "'Greg Eck'" <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005301d0d0ef$ad55d8f0$08018ad0$@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg,

 

I had some mistakes in the table of GA in my document in last mail.

I have corrected it and resent the file again to  forum.

 

Thanks and Best Regards,

 

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] 
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:47 PM
To: 'Greg Eck'; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org'
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment
MisMatch)

 

Hi Greg,

 

Let me bring our discussion of the FVS Assignment for QA/GA here. 

 

I have suggested two cleaned up structure for QA/GA in the attached
documents.

 

Please find it and check if it is work or not ?

 

Thanks and Best Regards,

 

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. 

 

Let’s go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.

 

Greg


Received on Friday, 7 August 2015 09:02:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC