- From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:47:25 +0900
- To: "'Greg Eck'" <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004401d0d0ed$af520900$0df61b00$@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg, Let me bring our discussion of the FVS Assignment for QA/GA here. I have suggested two cleaned up structure for QA/GA in the attached documents. Please find it and check if it is work or not ? Thanks and Best Regards, Jirimutu ========================================================== Almas Inc. 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo E-Mail: <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp Mobile : 090-6174-6115 Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/ <http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/ ========================================================== From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position. Greg
Attachments
- application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document attachment: FVS_Assignment_For_QA_GA.docx
Received on Friday, 7 August 2015 08:48:31 UTC