FVS Assignment for A (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

Hi Greg,

 

Here I continue my discussion around the  FVS assignment for U1820-A.

 

1.       I would like to amend one more glyph for f+FVS2. Please refer
following picture.

I saw you sugesstion image, it is not work on handwriting font. 

Please check the attached image which is zoomed to big enough to see
clearly.

 

2.     I can accept the I+FVS1 assignment, I do agree with Erdenchimeg's
following comment.

 

> Re point 3, the glyph at I+FVS1 (and M+FVS2 in NSM font)  is only used
after NNBSP, i.e. 

> it is always the first letter of a word suffix/case. 

> Teachers of Mongolian script always refer to this as initial form, which
is the basis for the coding at I+FVS1. 

> However, in the Unicode standard the decision was made to code it as a
middle form (basically because 

> it appears in the middle of the word), which is why it appears at M+FVS2
in some fonts. 

 

> I think the M+FVS2 combination could be omitted, as is done in BS. 

 

The M+FVS2 form of U1820_A should be omitted. We implemented our font as
this.

Just because our  glyph rendering basic principle listed below, there are
one M+FVS2 displaying on the
<http://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/variants>
http://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/variants

 

If there are no different variant forms for FVS2 or FVS3, we implement it
same with the default form 

or it means ignore the FVS2 or FVS3. It is not proper to become blank.  

The none in NP should give definition how to handle it, otherwise each
implementation goes different direction.

 

Thanks and Best Regards,

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 2:17 AM
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: FW: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

Hi Jirimutu,

 

If we limit our comments to just the 6 FVS assignments, this is what I see .

 

.         You are in agreement with my suggestions for the suggestions being
put before the UTC as outlined in my reponse to Erdenchimeg.

.         As to the new variant at U+1820/U+1821-Final swept left with no
space - would it be something like the attached? This is the sequence <
U+180A >< U+180A ><U+1820> with no MVS included. Would this not do?

.         You have further discussion on U+182D - let's wait until we find
resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

.         You have further discussion on U+136 - let's wait until we find
resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

 

Greg

 

 

 

From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:01 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

Hi Greg,

 

I have some inputs in the FVS assignment MisMatch documents.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [ <mailto:greck@postone.net> mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To:  <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. 

 

Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.

 

Greg